The really compelling bit, though, is the one comment on that journal article from a retired physician, Michael Holloway, PhD:
"One of the more disturbing common characteristics across pseudoscience topics and campaigns is the reluctance of academics and institutions to speak out against even the most harmful and egregious falsehoods for fear of political backlash and spending significant time on work for which they are not supported. These authors are right: it is the job of medical and academic institutions to take strong and effective action against pseudoscience campaigns that are actively killing people. No single individual should have to be sticking their head up despite a few principled individuals doing so.
A July 26th Washington Post article, Doctors who put lives at risk with covid misinformation rarely punished, reports the failure of medical boards and institutions to do their jobs. The success of politicizing the pandemic and medicine is primarily owed to a few academics and physicians with ties to respected institutions who've made themselves political stars. Instead of distancing themselves from the lies, their institutions either explicitly or implicitly protect these political actors with a false argument of academic freedom and free speech.
Two errors in this study: This is not the first article "to identify the types of COVID-19 misinformation." It is self-defeating to not reference those few individuals, like Peter Hotez, and online resources who've been carrying on the lonely fight. NYT and NPR are not the media sources of disinformation. Politicized cable broadcast news outlets are at least as responsible for the spread of disinformation as social media."
So good on JAMA for publicizing this problem. I'd add A.J. Leonardi to that list of people carrying on the fight. He's been proven prescient from the get go, and has to wade through considerable bullying from detractors in the field (some who write for the NYT), yet keeps going.
And about those politicized broadcasts: some covid-aware medical professionals are making fun of (or getting frustrated with) the many articles coming out right now that ponder, baffled, about some mysterious reason for so many deaths. It's such a bizarre choice by media, as if they'd be struck down dead if they connect these deaths with the virus that is continuing to spread unabated.
Canadian ER doctor, Kashif Pirzada, MD, linked to a Globe & Mail article with the headline, "More people than expected are dying in Canada in 2023 for reasons that are not yet clear," and said,
"91,000 dead (so far) for reasons that are quite clear especially when these deaths likely cluster around surges of a certain illness that shall not be named. This isn't rocket surgery. What other major cause of death surges a few times a year with little to no efforts at prevention?
From the CDC: "Excess Deaths Associated with Covid-19" I don't think not being able to go to brunch for a few months in 2020 is the explanation here. Lack of preventative care maybe, but why do the deaths surge with virus waves? Vaccines? Seriously? The ones most got two years ago?Then why are waves of death still happening? If it were vaccine related, you'd expect something right when most got them then, not in waves two years later."
No comments:
Post a Comment