It's interesting to me when people make fun of anyone taking what they perceive as undue precautions. There are two general reasons for precautions that seem unreasonable: #1 a lack of education or understanding on the part of the viewer and #2 a means to cope with stress on the part of the actor, i.e. a superstition. You'd think that neither of those scenarios would be enough to elicit harassment, but we're not there yet.
A great example of the former is when a neighbour was gardening in front of her house and her daughter asked to go inside. The mum had to get up to unlock the front door. So, that seems weird, right? She locks her door even when she's standing ten feet in front of it?? But she explained that, since her husband's a cop, she's acutely aware of how easily and how often people's homes are robbed, even with the owners standing right out front. This is a case of the actor having more information than the viewer. I still leave my doors unlocked when I'm in the yard, but I understand why she doesn't.
Recently a few guys in a car made a right-hand turn in front of my bike, stopped dead to block me, and ridiculed me for a for seconds for wearing a mask. I just backed up a bit and faced away from them, their breath a foot from my face. They drove on, and I continued my ride. But, WTF? From my vantage point, I feel like I fall in the former camp: I'm just more acutely aware of the dangers posed even outdoors. I live in one of the only regions in Ontario with rising Covid numbers. Our positive case rate today was 5.7% compared to the provincial average of 2.0. Everything opened based on the provincial numbers, but Waterloo isn't in the same bracket as the rest. It doesn't help that we're home to the Trinity Bible Chapel, which keeps openly violating orders to stop packing their church, and the anti-lockdown protests that brought Maxime Bernier here (provoking the ire of my city councillor pictured below), and one of the more complicated vaccination systems that leave a gap of up to 4 stressful weeks between signing up and actually getting an appointment. At this point, I will be amazed if I get vaxxed before the original 4 months waiting period. (ETA - got it June 17th in London - thanks #VaccineHunters!)
"to stay vigilant when socializing outside as they can still get infected with the virus. . . . If people are outside and they are neither distanced nor wearing masks, then just being outside is not sufficient to prevent spread. . . . If people are gathering outside for social gatherings, they should be very mindful of being distanced or masked. If you wanted to be completely safe you can do both. . . . Because the new variants are more transmissible, it is possible that people may have to distance more than two metres, even outside."
A year ago, I wrote about the necessity of calling out people who are acting in a harmful manner, including refusing to wear a mask, using a drunk driver analogy to make my point. This time I'm arguing that people refrain from calling out people who are acting in a harmless manner, even if we don't like or understand their behaviour, even if the behaviour really doesn't make sense. If it doesn't have potential to harm you or anyone else, then let it go. Isn't that just polite?
Maybe, for some people, it can feel like it's harming them. Perhaps they're distraught that I'm on the rival team, and yelling is a way to get me on board. Or maybe my mask is perceived to be judging them, as if I think I'm better, so they retaliate against a slight that didn't actually happen. It's similar to hatred of vegans who are just going about living their plant-eating lives. People can become belligerent when they feel their conception of themselves as a moral human being is threatened by someone following a principle they don't want to follow.
Otherwise, even if the actor is acting on a superstitious it shouldn't elicit such outrage. We don't yell at athletes for wearing lucky socks on game day! If someone truly believes that a mask does nothing protective, and that it's little more than a superstition to alleviate some stress for the wearer, then they should be happy they're not so afflicted with worry!
I also think there's something primal about it all. We seems to have an inborn desire to hide our fear like we hide our sadness or distress. If not, then we're instructed to play it cool. And demonstrating beta emotions does provoke a take down response from others, no matter how much we chant "real men cry too." Fear and sadness are both still seen as a sign of weakness and, like a wounded gazelle on the Serengeti, invite attacks from the lions in waiting. Curious that we can't override this. Our main resort once discovered is to shift sadness to anger. But that just makes everything worse. Tough guys get sad and scared. Is it just a matter of saying it enough to re-wire the takedown response?
2 comments:
You identified many reasons for the absurdity but I still believe we should stand our ground when it comes to caring for ourselves in the way that makes sense to us at this time in this body. Learning to give others the benefit of the doubt and minding our own business when appropriate would go along way to world peace.
Absolutely, Evelyn.
Post a Comment